Time To Overhaul Pentagon’s Soft-on-China ‘Defense Policy Board’

Advertisement
Help President Trump Stop Joe Biden [ACT NOW]

The Pentagon’s top leadership relies on the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee, also known as the Defense Policy Board (DPBAC or DPB) for “independent, informed advice and opinion concerning major matters of defense policy.”

Operating through the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD-P), the 13-member DPB consisting of prominent outside experts provides advice to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense, focusing on “long-term, enduring issues central to strategic planning.”

Sadly, today most of these experts are “soft on China” and at odds with President Trump’s forceful strategic response to the growing China menace.  An overhaul of the Board’s membership is urgently overdue.

As author, journalist, and China expert Bill Gertz notes, “Chief among those on the board with views that clash with Mr. Trump is former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, architect of the conciliatory U.S. policies that argued in favor of unfettered economic and diplomatic engagement with the communist regime.”

While at 97 Kissinger is not as active as before, Gertz points out that “his influence is said to remain strong among Pentagon leaders and others in the Trump administration.” But he is also surrounded by other soft-on-China members.

Former President Bill Clinton’s Deputy Defense Secretary Rudy deLeon, currently an Asia analyst with the liberal Center for American Progress, is also on the board.

Four other members, Adm. Gary Roughead, Mrs. Madeleine Albright, Ms. Jamie Gorelick, and Ms. Jane Harman were all added to the policy board in 2011 by President Obama “as part of an effort to slant it in a Democratic direction,” notes Gertz.

Albright and Harman are known Democrat partisans. As Clinton’s Secretary of State, Albright even pushed through China’s 2001 entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO), based on promises of reforms in Beijing that never materialized. But the WTO entry signaled a major victory in China’s march to global dominance.

Meanwhile, Gorelick was the liberal deputy attorney general under Bill Clinton who created the disastrous bureaucratic “wall” between intelligence and law enforcement agencies that hindered federal authorities from sharing information that could have prevented the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

There are a few conservatives on the board. They include J.D. Crouch, a Pentagon official in the George W. Bush administration; Paula Dobriansky, a former Reagan and Bush administration official; and Robert Joseph, a State Department official under Bush. There are also two moderate Republicans on the board who joined under Trump – former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia and former Sen. Jim Talent of Missouri.

One Republican policy board member added under Trump by Secretary James Mattis in 2017 is David McCormick, CEO of Bridgewater Associates, a hedge fund with extensive ties to China. Bridgewater China Investment Management is a unit of the hedge fund based in Shanghai. These close financial ties make him highly suspect to provide independent opinion on China policy.

Unfortunately, even with some China hawk members, the overall composition of the board tilts strongly toward dangerously failed China engagement policies of the past. Retired Navy Capt Jim Fanell, a former U.S. Pacific Fleet intelligence chief, goes further stating that:

While the current membership of the Defense Policy Board is comprised of very well-known names, the board’s current overall membership, save for a few exceptions, fundamentally represents the ‘engagement’ policy’ that is largely responsible for ignoring, even abetting, the People’s Republic of China’s militaristic and aggressive expansion in Asia over the past decade.

It seems clear the membership of the board does not represent the U.S. government’s policy towards the PRC as espoused in the 2017 National Security Strategy and the 2018 National Defense Strategy.

It is time to re-evaluate the Defense Policy Board and ensure that its members’ views align with the new strategic realities of the grave China threat, instead of the failed – even if lucrative to some – dangerous “engagement” policies of the past.

Advertisement
Help President Trump Stop Joe Biden [ACT NOW]

Paul Crespo

Paul Crespo is the Managing Editor of American Defense News. A defense and national security expert, he served as a Marine Corps officer and as a military attaché with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) at US embassies worldwide. Paul holds degrees from Georgetown, London, and Cambridge Universities. He is also CEO of SPECTRE Global Risk, a security advisory firm, and President of the Center for American Defense Studies, a national security think tank.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shen
Shen
5 months ago

AGREE. Can the bunch and get some true Americans on the Board. End this loyalty to Globalism and China at the expense of our own country.

Robert
Robert
5 months ago

Now I do suppose that is why so many older vets are die hard Republican, who want the crap kicked out of anyone they disagree with, or disagrees with them. The fact being we now since the UN was formed have international law rules which govern what can and can not be done to an enemy country, and it boils down to negotiations. not hard rock or kick A**, that is why the USA itself is in such bad shape no one wants to meet half way about anything that is on the table, and one side is a s bad as the other in most cases, hardliners holding things up for their own glorified purposes.

Query
5 months ago
Reply to  Robert

And you act as if Trump doesn’t exist and he is not doing just what you said. Giving him no credit! F liberal!

James
James
5 months ago

The Pentagon is just another tentacle of the monster we call “Big Government”. And most likely the seat of the “swamp”. It is overdue for a remake; one that is much smaller and less expensive. Just add up the manpower inside that domain and you’ll see what a waste of public funds it has become. Even cancelling out the redundancy would save taxpayers millions yearly.

Anne Farrelly
Anne Farrelly
5 months ago

Trump needs to replace every one of these clowns for a whole new advisory.

Truckmant
Truckmant
5 months ago

what is that bunch of people even allowed to work with the government Kissinger has never been nothing but a traitor to the US ever since he been here and a bunch more of them is no better

Tim Kuehl
Tim Kuehl
5 months ago

Henry Kissinger is a no good globalist, Tri-Lateralist and and all around arrogant POS who hates America being a sovereign nation. He also once said our military men were nothing but dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns of foreign policy.

Vince
Vince
5 months ago

That group of people make Heinrich Himmler look like alter boys. It look like they have more power then the President of the United States.

trackback

[…] weeks after I published my piece urging an overhaul of the Pentagon’s soft-on-China ‘Defense Policy Board’ (DPB), President Trump did just that. […]

trackback

[…] weeks after I published my piece urging an overhaul of the Pentagon’s soft-on-China ‘Defense Policy Board’ (DPB), President Trump did just that. […]

trackback

[…] November — as I had urged in October — the Pentagon announced the dismissal of most of its outside advisory group, the […]


People, Places & Things