Trump Reshuffles Top Pentagon Leadership Pending Elections Result

The White House from Washington, DC via Wikimedia Commons

Amidst legal challenges to the vote counts in several key states, President Trump has refused to concede the election to Joe Biden who the media have “declared president-elect.” As I have noted, Trump is within his rights not to accept Biden as the winner until those challenges have ended, votes are certified, and a winner “ascertained” by the General Services Administration (GSA) under the Presidential Transition Act of 1963.

Or, until the Electoral College meets and votes for the president-elect in December. In the interim, Trump has begun major reshuffling of the top tier of Pentagon leadership.

As I reported earlier, Defense Secretary Mark Esper was ‘terminated” by President Trump on Monday and replaced by acting Secretary Christopher Miller, a former Army Special Forces officer, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, and the Senate confirmed head of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). The next day, several other top-ranking Pentagon officials were asked to resign and were replaced by so-called “Trump loyalists.”

Among them, a staunch conservative, solid thinker, Trump supporter, and friend since our days together at Marine officer school, Dr. James Anderson. He had been Acting Under Secretary for Policy since June, after Performing the Duties of Undersecretary since February.

Replacing him as the Pentagon’s top policy chief is retired Army general Anthony Tata whose nomination to that same job was withdrawn earlier this year because of controversial tweets he had made about Islam and President Barack Obama. In one tweet Tata said that Islam was the “most oppressive religion I know of,” which while contentious, is objectively not far off the mark.

Tata is now Performing the Duties of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy

In addition to Anderson, “Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security Mr. Joseph Kernan and Chief of Staff to the Secretary of Defense, Jen Stewart submitted letters of resignation,” said a Pentagon statement issued Tuesday afternoon, reported by ABC News.

ABC News continued:

The statement added that Kernan had submitted his resignation Tuesday, “as planned for several months” and that he would be succeeded by Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the current acting assistant secretary of defense for special operation and low-intensity conflict.

Stewart’s replacement as the chief of staff to the Defense Secretary is Kash Patel, who had been serving as a top official at the National Security Council.

Prior to his job at the White House Patel served as a top aide to Rep. Devin Nunes on the House Intelligence Committee where he was involved in helping to discredit partisan investigations involving the Trump campaign and Russia. In his new role, Patel will manage access to the secretary of defense and most Pentagon decisions.

Then there is Cohen-Watnick, who is now Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. ABC News noted that he “has held several jobs in the Trump administration including a stint as a key aide to Michael Flynn, Trump’s first national security adviser.”

Critics such as Mick Mulroy, an ABC News consultant who served as the deputy assistant secretary for the Middle East under Secretary James Mattis and Secretary Esper, bemoaned the major changes at the Pentagon, saying, “Replacing him [Secretary Esper] as well as other senior leaders now and all at once was not responsible nor consistent with ensuring stability,”

However, Mulroy also described Miller as “a consummate professional, highly intelligent and competent and absolutely dedicated to the nation,” adding, “He will be handed a very difficult job that I am sure he did not ask for. We should all get behind and support him.”

Meanwhile, Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller quickly took charge, holding a secure video conference “with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, top combatant commanders, and top Pentagon civilians to lay out his plans for the next 71 days that he will serve in the post,” reported ABC News.

Paul Crespo is the Managing Editor of American Defense News. A defense and national security expert, he served as a Marine Corps officer and as a military attaché with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) at US embassies worldwide. Paul holds degrees from Georgetown, London, and Cambridge Universities. He is also CEO of SPECTRE Global Risk, a security advisory firm, and President of the Center for American Defense Studies, a national security think tank. - - PAULCRESPO.COM

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 years ago

The courts are looking at voter fraud all wrong. Most courts won’t even hear a case of voter fraud unless, who they presume to be the plaintiff (i.e. One of the candidates in the race) is able to show that the fraud may have a chance of changing the outcome. In other words that the crime caused harm to the plaintiff.
This way of looking at voter fraud must end. Every instance of voter fraud (even 1 vote) has a profound negative effect on many voters. The real plaintiff here is each and every American voter. How do you put a price on a lifetime of having no faith in the system, the depression and anxiety of knowing your voice will never be heard and you will be forced to live under the rules of a party that doesn’t care about you, but only about power, and your freedoms eroded?
All it takes is 1 fraudulent vote anywhere in the country and my vote has just been nullified. I don’t care if it doesn’t change the results of the election. I don’t care if it effects the results of my town, precinct, county or state election. That’s not the point. At the end of the day when all the votes are counted and totaled, I want my vote to have sent a message to my leaders. My vote counts, or, at least it should. Sadly, for the past few decades, I seriously doubt it has ever counted in any election because, as we all know, fraud exists, it happens in every election and we’ve all accepted that for years. We don’t have to accept it and we shouldn’t. Every case should be heard, every case tried, and every proven case should result in consequences. If you can’t track down the specific individual who cast the fraudulent vote, hold the state or the state AG office accountable. Someone needs to be held accountable and there needs to consequences for every case reported no madder how small. One case is too many.
The big problem we have here is that the liberals always claim there’s no fraud or very little fraud. Conservatives all know that’s not true. The liberals claim there’s no evidence of it systemically over time. That’s because they are all small cases, many, many small cases, so they never get recorded, they just get dismissed, every single time! We must start keeping record of every single case, alleged, and proven or dis-proven.
Is it not suspicious to the people and judges across this country that when dead people vote, they always seem to vote for democrats? Is it not suspicious to the people and judges that computer glitches and miscounts always seem to benefit democrats? Enough is enough, no more “acceptable level” of fraud, because it’s only an acceptable level until it’s not. We need voter I.D. and an assurance of 1 citizen 1 vote.

Raphael Montanez
Raphael Montanez
2 years ago

Thanks for the short and informative details on changes within the Department of Defense. I have listened to General Tata on various news outlets and he comes across as a knowledgeable and honorable man. I have also admired Army LTG Boykin over the years for his frank and honest views concerning on-going threats to our nation and our global interests. Keep up the excellent work and support to our Great nation and our prayers go out to the men and women serving to protect our way of life and our national interests.
R Motanez, Majr (Ret) US Army HUMINT

2 years ago

Could it be that the president is just getting ready for the upheaval promised by our “guardians of evil” should they not be satisfied with the election outcome?? As I recall. Esper did not support the President (refused a direct command??) during the previous (and continuing) riots. I believe the President was considering the imposition of Marshal Law to bring an “immediate” cessation to the lawlessness.

Allen Rutledge
Allen Rutledge
2 years ago

Very glad to see Mark Esper go. He is a deep state CFR member and I never understood his selection for the post. If Trump gets the globalists and war hawks out of defense, I will be pleased. We have had bad generals and upper leadership in the past and it is time they are cleared out. From Eisenhower to Marshall to Vinegar Joe Stilwell there are those who have seriously hurt this country and helped the communist cause worldwide.

People, Places & Things